|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gordon Hurford |
|
UC Berkeley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FASR Workshop Green Bank 25 May 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Fixed” pre-observation calibrations |
|
Relative amplitudes, phases |
|
Baselines, pointing, etc |
|
|
|
Time-dependent “Daily” calibrations |
|
Time-dependent gain |
|
Time-dependent phases |
|
Interference survey? |
|
|
|
Post-observation calibrations |
|
Application of fixed calibrations, data editing,
etc |
|
Self-calibration |
|
closure amplitudes and phases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requirements need to be science-driven |
|
|
|
(rough estimates -- to be used as ‘talking
points’ only) |
|
|
|
Absolute flux scale |
|
~5% |
|
|
|
Relative flux vs frequency |
|
~1% for nearby frequencies |
|
~3% for frequencies separated by an octave |
|
|
|
Absolute locations |
|
~1 arcsecond at 20 GHz |
|
eases to ~1 arcmin at 100 MHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A different problem than at microwave
frequencies |
|
Absolute flux scale is less important |
|
More reliance on system phase stability |
|
Reliance on self-calibration |
|
Location accuracy limited by ionosphere |
|
Colocated LOFAR could help with absolute
locations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline redundancy |
|
May be useful |
|
By itself, cannot meet requirements |
|
|
|
Conventional approach |
|
Reasonable, but not heroic measures to stabilize
system phase |
|
Add 1 or 2 large antennas for non-solar
calibrations |
|
Interrupt solar observations every hour or two
to recalibrate |
|
|
|
Comments on conventional approach |
|
Cost of large antennas is equivalent to many
small antennas |
|
Interruptions degrade solar science |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large number of small antennas has sensitivity
comparable to a moderate sized antenna.
(Calibrator sensitivity ~ n * A) |
|
|
|
Wide bandwidth (Calibrator sensitivity ~ ÖBW) |
|
|
|
Even with large antennas, must rely heavily on
self-calibration to achieve dynamic range goals. |
|
|
|
Will almost always have compact solar sources in
FOV |
|
|
|
Frequency-dependence of phase variations with
time can be simply parameterized (eg
terms that scale with f and f^-2.) |
|
|
|
Lots of time available for daily pre- and
post-observation calibration |
|
|
|
Frequency coverage suggests that communications
satellites might be useful as secondary calibrators. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overnight calibrator observations used to update
locations and motions of selected communications satellites |
|
|
|
Overnight calibrations used as starting point
for full-disk mapping and establishment of positions of dominant solar
compact sources |
|
|
|
Solar self-calibration used to refine antenna
phases |
|
Will gradually increase uncertainty in location
of solar sources. |
|
|
|
Periodically, a small subset of antennas briefly
observe a pre-located communications satellite. (Preserves continuity of solar coverage.) |
|
|
|
Returning subset is used to update absolute
locations of compact solar sources. |
|
|
|
At end of day, long calibration on phase
calibrator to confirm inferred antenna phases and compact source locations. |
|
|
|
|
|