Polarization Calibration: Difference between revisions
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
For completeness: | For completeness: | ||
:<math>\begin{align | :<math>\begin{align} | ||
Stokes \, Q = XX^* - YY^* \\ | Stokes \, Q &= XX^* - YY^* \\ | ||
Stokes \, U = XY^* - YX^* \\ | Stokes \, U &= XY^* - YX^* \\ | ||
P_{linear} = \sqrt{U^2 + Q^2} \\ | P_{linear} &= \sqrt{U^2 + Q^2} \\ | ||
\Theta = \frac{1}{2}\tan^{-1}{\frac{U}{Q}} | \Theta &= \frac{1}{2}\tan^{-1}{\frac{U}{Q}} | ||
\end{align | \end{align} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Revision as of 20:26, 24 September 2016
Linear to Circular Conversion
At EOVSA’s linear feeds, in the electric field the linear polarization, X and Y, relates to RCP and LCP (R and L) as:
In terms of autocorrelation powers, we have the 4 polarization products XX*, YY*, XY* and YX*, where the * denotes complex conjugation. The quantities RR* and LL* are then
One problem is that there is generally a non-zero delay in Y with respect to X. This creates phase slopes in XY* and YX* from which we can determine the delay very accurately. As a check,
For completeness:
When I plot the quantities I, V, R and L as measured (Figure 1) for geosynchronous satellite Ciel-2, the results look reasonable, except that there are parts of the band where R and L are mis-assigned, and others where they do not separate well.
The problem is that residual phase slope of Y with respect to X, caused by a difference in delay between the two channels. This can be seen in the upper panel of Figure 2, which shows the uncorrected phases of XY* and YX*. To correct the phases, the RCP phase was fit by a linear least-squares routine, and then the phases were offset by π/2 for both XY* and YX* according to:
Polarization Mixing Correction
Due to relative feed rotation between az-al mounted antennas and equatorial mounted antennas