2017 April: Difference between revisions

From EOVSA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:


= Apr 04 =
= Apr 04 =
[[File:Bz_figure.png|thumb|400px|'''Fig. 1:''' Demonstration of <math>\Delta B_z</math> plot for 12 baselines, plotting <math>\Delta B_z</math> (cm) vs. frequency using just the phase difference <math>\Delta\phi = \phi_{3C273} - \phi_{3C286}</math>, then again using <math>\Delta\phi-2\pi</math> and a third time using <math>\Delta\phi-4\pi</math>.  The set of points show a curve when an inappropriate phase offset is used, but a straight line at the correct <math>B_z</math> value when the correct one is used.]]
[[File:Bz_figure.png|thumb|300px|'''Fig. 1:''' Demonstration of <math>\Delta B_z</math> plot for 12 baselines, plotting <math>\Delta B_z</math> (cm) vs. frequency using just the phase difference <math>\Delta\phi = \phi_{3C273} - \phi_{3C286}</math>, then again using <math>\Delta\phi-2\pi</math> and a third time using <math>\Delta\phi-4\pi</math>.  The set of points show a curve when an inappropriate phase offset is used, but a straight line at the correct <math>B_z</math> value when the correct one is used.]]


'''04:20 UT''' I am running a new schedule called two_src_pa-track.scd, which is tracking the Ant14 position angle, alternating between 3C273 and 3C286 every 30 minutes, and using pcal.fsq.  The wind is going to be a problem, it looks like...  I corrected Ant 13's <math>B_x</math> and <math>B_y</math>.  I also have good <math>B_z</math> corrections, but I am not sure of the sign, so I am afraid to set them.  I discovered a nice way to plot the data ('''Figure 1'''), to find the <math>B_z</math> correction without any <math>2\pi</math> ambiguities.
'''04:20 UT''' I am running a new schedule called two_src_pa-track.scd, which is tracking the Ant14 position angle, alternating between 3C273 and 3C286 every 30 minutes, and using pcal.fsq.  The wind is going to be a problem, it looks like...  I corrected Ant 13's <math>B_x</math> and <math>B_y</math>.  I also have good <math>B_z</math> corrections, but I am not sure of the sign, so I am afraid to set them.  I discovered a nice way to plot the data ('''Figure 1'''), to find the <math>B_z</math> correction without any <math>2\pi</math> ambiguities.
Line 17: Line 17:
'''04:42 UT''' After about 20 min, I noticed a problem with the schedule--it was not listing the type of observation as PHASECAL (called it PACAL instead).  I updated the schedule to fix that, and while I was at it, I bit the bullet and set the <math>B_z</math> values after all.  We'll just see how it goes, and whether I have the wrong sign or not.  I elected to just follow the same approach as for <math>B_x</math> and <math>B_y</math>.
'''04:42 UT''' After about 20 min, I noticed a problem with the schedule--it was not listing the type of observation as PHASECAL (called it PACAL instead).  I updated the schedule to fix that, and while I was at it, I bit the bullet and set the <math>B_z</math> values after all.  We'll just see how it goes, and whether I have the wrong sign or not.  I elected to just follow the same approach as for <math>B_x</math> and <math>B_y</math>.


[[File:Bz_figure_corrected.png|thumb|400px|'''Fig. 2:''' A new measurement of <math>\Delta B_z</math> (cm) after applying the corrections indicated in Figure 1.  Now all of the errors are zero!  Note the change of scale.]]
[[File:Bz_figure_corrected.png|thumb|300px|'''Fig. 2:''' A new measurement of <math>\Delta B_z</math> (cm) after applying the corrections indicated in Figure 1.  Now all of the errors are zero!  Note the change of scale.]]


'''05:54 UT''' The data look great!  The <math>B_z</math> corrections are definitely an improvement, see '''Figure 2'''.  Also, the PA rotation is working perfectly, so that the XY and YX phases on ants 1-8 are just noise, and the other polarizations are strong and flat.  The wind is cooperating, so I suppose this will continue all evening and provide an excellent basis for checking all of the baseline corrections.
'''05:54 UT''' The data look great!  The <math>B_z</math> corrections are definitely an improvement, see '''Figure 2'''.  Also, the PA rotation is working perfectly, so that the XY and YX phases on ants 1-8 are just noise, and the other polarizations are strong and flat.  The wind is cooperating, so I suppose this will continue all evening and provide an excellent basis for checking all of the baseline corrections.
Line 23: Line 23:
'''12:03 UT''' The calibration demonstrates that the baselines are nailed.  '''Figure 3''' shows the phases vs. HA on the lowest frequency.  '''Figure 4''' shows multi-band delays (phase vs. frequency) after integrating over the entire timerange.  In '''Figure 3''', the phases are identical, and essentially flat, for the two sources 3C273 (blue) and 3C286 (orange).  In '''Figure 4''', the phases are identical (blue points are almost invisible) over the entire frequency range, except there is perhaps a slight <math>B_z</math> error on Ant 8 and, especially, Ant 13.
'''12:03 UT''' The calibration demonstrates that the baselines are nailed.  '''Figure 3''' shows the phases vs. HA on the lowest frequency.  '''Figure 4''' shows multi-band delays (phase vs. frequency) after integrating over the entire timerange.  In '''Figure 3''', the phases are identical, and essentially flat, for the two sources 3C273 (blue) and 3C286 (orange).  In '''Figure 4''', the phases are identical (blue points are almost invisible) over the entire frequency range, except there is perhaps a slight <math>B_z</math> error on Ant 8 and, especially, Ant 13.


[[File:Baseline_solved.png|thumb|400px|'''Fig. 3:''' Phase of 3C273 (blue) and 3C286 (orange) vs. hour angle based on observations on 2017-04-04, demonstrating near-perfect baseline corrections.]]
[[File:Baseline_solved.png|thumb|800px|'''Fig. 3:''' Phase of 3C273 (blue) and 3C286 (orange) vs. hour angle based on observations on 2017-04-04, demonstrating near-perfect baseline corrections.]]


[[File:Baseline_solved-v-fghz.png|thumb|400px|'''Fig. 4:''' Phase of 3C273 (blue) and 3C286 (orange) vs. frequency based on observations on 2017-04-04, demonstrating near-perfect baseline corrections.]]
[[File:Baseline_solved-v-fghz.png|thumb|800px|'''Fig. 4:''' Phase of 3C273 (blue) and 3C286 (orange) vs. frequency based on observations on 2017-04-04, demonstrating near-perfect baseline corrections.]]

Revision as of 12:28, 4 April 2017

Back to Observing Log

Apr 01

23:50 UT We had some nice solar activity (M4 flare) around 21:50 UT, which was completely covered by RHESSI. I am taking some calibration data (3C84, pcal.fsq) starting around 00:20 UT, and hope that we can do some imaging of this event. The wind has been high for two straight days, but has finally subsided for the first time, to enable the calibration.

Apr 02

11:04 UT The system took data on 3C273 and 3C286 all night, using pcal.fsq and 30-min scans. The data look very nice, but I am not happy with the oscillations I saw in yesterday's solar data, which I suspect may be due to an unsynchronized correlator clock. Therefore, I rebooted the ROACHes (Kjell connected the 10 MHz reference to the signal generator on Friday), in the hopes that it will perform better in the long-term. I am now taking data on 3C286 with 3bands.fsq, with which to determine and correct delay changes due to the reboot. There was another M flare overnight, so more activity may be present today.

Apr 03

02:07 UT We got no less than three (!) M-class flares today (yesterday in UT day). The M2 flare observed after 1800UT was covered by RHESSI in its rise phase. The observations went well, and I also did a gain/attenuation calibration observation, to attempt to remove the effect of attenuation changes on total power and correlation data. Unfortunately, the wind came up this afternoon and we did not get a successful 3C84 calibration. We did get the morning and noon one, however.

Apr 04

Fig. 1: Demonstration of plot for 12 baselines, plotting (cm) vs. frequency using just the phase difference , then again using and a third time using . The set of points show a curve when an inappropriate phase offset is used, but a straight line at the correct value when the correct one is used.

04:20 UT I am running a new schedule called two_src_pa-track.scd, which is tracking the Ant14 position angle, alternating between 3C273 and 3C286 every 30 minutes, and using pcal.fsq. The wind is going to be a problem, it looks like... I corrected Ant 13's and . I also have good corrections, but I am not sure of the sign, so I am afraid to set them. I discovered a nice way to plot the data (Figure 1), to find the correction without any ambiguities.

04:42 UT After about 20 min, I noticed a problem with the schedule--it was not listing the type of observation as PHASECAL (called it PACAL instead). I updated the schedule to fix that, and while I was at it, I bit the bullet and set the values after all. We'll just see how it goes, and whether I have the wrong sign or not. I elected to just follow the same approach as for and .

Fig. 2: A new measurement of (cm) after applying the corrections indicated in Figure 1. Now all of the errors are zero! Note the change of scale.

05:54 UT The data look great! The corrections are definitely an improvement, see Figure 2. Also, the PA rotation is working perfectly, so that the XY and YX phases on ants 1-8 are just noise, and the other polarizations are strong and flat. The wind is cooperating, so I suppose this will continue all evening and provide an excellent basis for checking all of the baseline corrections.

12:03 UT The calibration demonstrates that the baselines are nailed. Figure 3 shows the phases vs. HA on the lowest frequency. Figure 4 shows multi-band delays (phase vs. frequency) after integrating over the entire timerange. In Figure 3, the phases are identical, and essentially flat, for the two sources 3C273 (blue) and 3C286 (orange). In Figure 4, the phases are identical (blue points are almost invisible) over the entire frequency range, except there is perhaps a slight error on Ant 8 and, especially, Ant 13.

Fig. 3: Phase of 3C273 (blue) and 3C286 (orange) vs. hour angle based on observations on 2017-04-04, demonstrating near-perfect baseline corrections.
Fig. 4: Phase of 3C273 (blue) and 3C286 (orange) vs. frequency based on observations on 2017-04-04, demonstrating near-perfect baseline corrections.
Retrieved from "http://ovsa.njit.edu//wiki/index.php?title=2017_April&oldid=960"