2016 November: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
03:41 UT Found a potential problem DELAYCAL_END.ctl, so took another two sets of data. '''Still bad!''' | 03:41 UT Found a potential problem DELAYCAL_END.ctl, so took another two sets of data. '''Still bad!''' | ||
04:14 UT Started another set of data. After studying schedule.py, another problem was found. DELAYCAL_END command has to have CIEL-2 as second value on the line, otherwise source id is set to None! | 04:14 UT Started roachcal.scd for another set of data. After studying schedule.py, another problem was found. DELAYCAL_END command has to have CIEL-2 as second value on the line, otherwise source id is set to None! '''Yay! It finally worked!''' | ||
Revision as of 04:25, 5 November 2016
Nov 04
19:18 UT Reboot ROACHes to clear fault light and test whether large delays are still present. They were power-cycled and reloaded.
19:24 UT Started roachcal.scd to take packet capture data for checking delays. Still bad!
Nov 05
03:41 UT Found a potential problem DELAYCAL_END.ctl, so took another two sets of data. Still bad!
04:14 UT Started roachcal.scd for another set of data. After studying schedule.py, another problem was found. DELAYCAL_END command has to have CIEL-2 as second value on the line, otherwise source id is set to None! Yay! It finally worked!